Mandat

Membres et organisation

Plan d’action

Documents de la Commission

Mandats d'études externes

Code de déontologie et d’éthique

Centre de presse


Consultations publiques des organismes de nature provinciale ou multirégionale

Document de réflexion - Septembre 2004

Portraits forestiers régionaux

Consultations régionales (avril-juin 2004)

 

CENTRE DE PRESSE


Serious questions raised about the tools used to estimate the maximum sustainable yield

Québec, December 14, 2004 – A comparison of the last two forest surveys in Québec reveals an overall drop of 4.1% in the volume of merchantable wood on productive and accessible forest land. This decline translates into a decrease of 7% for softwood species and an increase of 2.5% for hardwood species.

The Commission for the study of public forest management in Québec, which tabled its report today, finds the situation worrisome. However, armed with technical analyses and reports, the Commission points out that it is possible to turn this situation around.

Overall, the Commission found that in the past 20 years, the methods used to manage forests in the boreal zone have not made it possible to achieve the wood yields required to sustain the harvest volumes currently authorized.

“This decline in merchantable softwood volumes shows that the combined removal of wood – either through harvesting or losses from natural disturbances or tree mortality – has exceeded the production capacity of softwood forests,” explained Éric Bauce, one of the Commission members.

According to Mr. Bauce, the Commission found that for the boreal softwood forest, several regions have been subject to a kind of high grading at the stand level. This not only means a decline in merchantable volumes, more or less pronounced depending on the species, but also that the wood is becoming less accessible economically due to its distance away from mills and the fact it is geographically more spread out or of lower quality. Due to this situation, the Commission is tabling a series of recommendations so that, in the future, harvesting activities better take into account tree quality and stand accessibility, in space and in time.

Like several of the groups that spoke at the public hearings, the Commission is deeply concerned by the current degraded state of hardwood forests. Despite efforts by the ministère des Ressources naturelles, de la Faune et des Parcs (MRNFP) to promote single-tree selection cutting, the Commission found that certain companies went so far as to cut down most of the good trees, leaving the forest to degrade even further. “This situation where the best trees are cut one by one goes counter to all sustainable development principles and is even more unacceptable since this situation was clearly in the making over twenty years ago,” pointed out Commission member André Bouchard.

Based on the action plan tabled by the MRNFP to remedy the hardwood forest situation, the Commission believes that it is necessary to give these corrective measures time to work. However, should there be no noticeable improvement in the next two or three years, the MRNFP should seriously consider assuming the entire responsibility for marking the trees to be harvested.

The Commission, chaired by Guy Coulombe, also concluded that the methods currently used to assess the state of forests and to evaluate the maximum sustainable yield in Québec forests present serious deficiencies.

These conclusions are corroborated by three major studies conducted in the last year. With a mandate from the Commission, two of these technical studies were done by outside firms (CERFO and Optivert), whereas the third study was undertaken by a scientific committee overseen by the MRNFP.

The Commission is deeply concerned by these findings. “Our analyses confirm that Québec seriously lags behind when it comes to adopting new technologies and ensuring the statistical rigor that would enable it to have an accurate portrait of the state of its forests. This deficiency not only has major consequences for the volume of wood that can be harvested in public forests, but also for decisions regarding the integrated management of resources on Québec land,“ pointed out Commission member Éric Bauce.

Backed by studies, the Commission believes that it is possible to remedy this situation. It has therefore tabled a series of recommendations that aim, among other things, at improving the forest survey system and the maximum sustainable yield estimates so that the next round of management plans for Québec’s public forests can start anew, on more solid footing.

The Commission therefore recommends that the next management plans come into force only in 2008, rather than according to the current timetable of 2007, so that in the meantime, Québec can put in place the necessary technical tools to take into account the spatial dimensions relating to available wood volumes.

“The good news is that these tools exist and are used elsewhere,” explained Commission member Éric Bauce. “In a few months, we were able to demonstrate that it is entirely feasible to take basic data from the current system (Sylva software), and add them to other tools that make it possible to spatialize maximum sustainable yield estimates.”

If changes are made quickly, the Commission is confident that the next estimates of available wood volumes will better reflect the true state of forests along with the location of stands and trees that should be harvested. This will be done in accordance to environmental standards, the sites to be protected and the needs of all forest resource users.

The recommendations regarding the changes needed in the forest survey system and to timber management are mainly outlined in Chapters 5 and 6 of the Commission’s report.

-30-

Source :

Gino Desrosiers
Communications Officer
(418) 644-1350
gino.desrosiers@commission-foret.qc.ca

<< Retour au centre de presse